Saturday, May 28, 2016

Mosher Court Date and Time

Below is the calendar entry for the

Rutland Criminal Court
9 Merchants Row, Rutland, VT 05701
(802) 786-5880
 


 
Monday,    Jun.  6      State vs. Mosher, Craig
at 3:00 PM  in Room 2   363-4-16 Rdcr/Criminal
                           Status Conference
                           Plaintiff, State  (Rosemary M. Kennedy)
                           Defendant, Craig Mosher  (Paul S. Volk)



If you are interested in supporting Craig in this matter please come to the hearing. 
There is also a groundswell of people who want to protest at the courthouse. If you are interested let me know.

Thursday, May 26, 2016

Guess What? Craig Mosher Is A Hero. And A Lover Of Bulls.

 Jon Katz 
BEDLAMFARM.com

 

 Killington Lodge, After Irene 

Killington Lodge, After Irene

So it turns out that Craig Mosher is a much-admired local hero in his community.
Farmers across Vermont and animal lovers everywhere are stunned and up in arms over the indictment of Mosher, a Killington excavator and animal lover, and a hero of the recovery efforts following Hurricane Irene. Mosher was indicted by a Grand Jury eight months after a Scottish Highland pet bull – Red – broke through his fence, and was hit by a car. The driver, a 64-year-old part-time resident of the town, was killed, as was his bull.
The man's wife was injured but survived.
Rutland State Prosecutor Rosemary Kennedy has charged Mosher with involuntary manslaughter, which carries a prison sentence of from one to 15 years. This is believed to be one of the first, if not the first,  time in the country that the owner of an animal was charged with a criminal offense for what has always been considered an unfortunate but inevitable part of owning livestock on pasture or dogs and cats in a house.
Mosher was out looking for his bull when the accident on a busy and well-lit highway near his property.
It turns out that Mosher is a much admired neighbor, animal owner and member of the community. It turns out he is a hero, in fact. In 2011, Hurricane Irene devastated Vermont and cut off people in Killington and other communities. Thousands of people, including the elderly and the sick, were marooned, unable to get to food or medicine.
Mosher, an excavator, didn't wait for the FEMA bureaucrats to arrive, he and his crew began re-directing the river into its bed. Bloomberg News and other media wrote about his selfless – and unpaid – efforts to help is neighbors. At least 400 cars packed with tourists were stranded for days. Mosher freed them.
There were many heroes in Vermont following Irene. Mosher stood out.
"Craig is definitely a local hero," said Roger Rivera, 33, an emergency worker with the state of Vermont. "This is what Vermonters do. We don't wait for  help. We help ourselves." Rescued refugee tourists, hungry and tired, were also grateful to Mosher for digging out an escape route. "Vermonters have been great. We are glad to be getting out of here."
He doesn't sound like a criminally negligent person.
There is absolutely no one in all of rural life who has not had one of their animals escape or lived near someone who has, or seen animals on the road. When it happens, we all rush to help and almost all of the time, the animals are returned safely. It is unimaginable that hard working farmers or people who love animals should have this kind of incident criminalized in so thoughtless and arrogant a way.
In July of last year, Red, the bull got out through a fence after a tree limb fell on it and opened it up.  It has happened to me, and if you have any kind of animal, it can happen to you.
I called a local veterinarian who told me that "Craig takes wonderful care of his animals, I've been out there, and he loved the bulls very much, they are well fed, have broad pastures to graze, get the best medical care. He's a model when it comes to that.."
And, the vet added, he has excellent fences, they are both beautiful and safe.
A neighbor messaged me to talk about Mosher's civic commitment. "He's a little league coach, very open, friendly, community minded. He is the classic Vermonter, he cares about the environment, the community…"
Animals and nature do not pay much attention to regulations and even the best prevention efforts. Thousands of fences were destroyed in Hurricane Irene, it took weeks, even months to round up all of the animals who ran off terrified during that storm.
But even without a hurricane, a hundred things can lead to an animal's escape on a farm – fences that rot, lightning, are accidentally opened, damaged by fallen trees, flooding, eaten by insects or rodents, undone by large animals that nose wires up, failed charges on electric fences. And the same is true for dogs and cats. Unless one lives in a prison compound, they will sometimes get out, and sometimes they will run in the road and sometimes they will be killed and innocent passers-by will be injured, sometimes killed, as well.
Once, at the first Bedlam Farm, some children came by without my knowledge or permission to bring carrots to my donkeys, they entered and left the pasture without closing the gate, and when I came home, the donkeys were standing quietly out in the middle of the road. Three of my neighbors were out with carrots and grain to lure them back. I am grateful Rosemary Kennedy was not a prosecutor in my town, I'd still be in jail. So would you, if you love animals and live with them.
I don't call those happenings crimes, I call them life, and especially, life with animals. No living thing is immune from life, and it is dark thing for government officials to criminalize life itself, and life with animals in particular. The animal rights movement has popularized the idea that animals are above us, and must be made to live free from travail or accident – or life. I'm guessing that is part of this awful decision.
It is difficult enough to have an animal, the more controversial and expensive and fraught it becomes, the fewer and fewer animals there will be in the world. We need to make it easier for people to live with animals, if we wish for any to survive our greed and selfishness. If we wish to keep eating well, we must understand the lives of farmers. Few farmers can afford tall and fail-safe fences, they usually build them themselves, and they have to cover a lot of ground. We have lost any understanding of the real lives of farmers, and we prosecute them at our peril. They are the world's greatest and most practiced animal lovers, but their animals are not just pets for them.
Such a precedent as Mosher going to jail for this would be especially devastating to farmers, many of whom are already saying in Vermont that they will no longer permit their animals to graze freely outside of their barns. It is impossible to know how many animals will be abandoned, put to death, sent to slaughter, or simply not acquired for fear of this kind of Orwellian prosecution. Farmers depend on neighbors and second-homers to lease their land for pasture, they are already getting calls from people canceling those arrangements because they don't want to end up in jail.
It would also be a catastrophe for animal and pet owners. Dogs escape from homes all the time, and they run into roads all the time, and some of them get killed and cause accidents, where people get hurt or killed. Craig Mosher is all of us, and his fate is our fate. Sometimes they will get out, and if any animal escape can be considered a crime, not an accident, that will have profound and devastating consequences for the animal world. Farmers will not be able to use neighbor's pastures or afford insurance rates. Any cat that sneaks under a fence runs dashes across a street can ruin a family and sent his or her owner to jail.
To me, this is an outrageous overreach of government by a legal system that makes life-and-death decisions about farming and animals and pets, but seems to know nothing about them or the people who own them.
The indictment needs to fail. It is wrong on every level. Government exists to protect freedom and property, not to take away both for no reason.
The Vermont Farm Bureau is asking farmer and animals lovers to come to Craig Mosher's June 6 hearing in Rutland Court. They are asking farmers and animal lovers to write to Vermont legislators and, if possible, come support Mosher in person. When Joshua Rockwood was arrested and charged (falsely) with 13 counts of animal cruelty, more thn 300 farmers and supporters showed up at his court hearing. I thought the judge's eyes would pop right out of his head. Politicians pay attention to crowds like that.
You can also get a look at Craig Mosher – his pet donkeys, sheep and bulls – even a glimpse of his impressive fencing, on a YouTube video made shortly after Irene. This is a wrong that must be righted, and I believe it will be.

An Outrage - Craig Mosher And The Criminalizing Of The Animal World

The Criminalizing Of The Animal World
The Criminalizing Of The Animal World

by Jon Katz
BEDLAMFARM.com

http://www.bedlamfarm.com/2016/05/25/an-outrage-craig-mosher-and-the-criminalizing-of-the-animal-world/


In July of 2015, a Woodbridge, Connecticut couple were traveling west on a Vermont highway when they struck and killed a large Scottish Highlander bull that had escaped from its pasture, according to the Vermont State Police.  The driver, a 64 year-old man, was killed, his wife was injured but recovered.
It was an awful accident.It is now a crime.
Animal escapes are a part of rural life, accidents as serious as this as rare as they are awful. A tree had fallen on the fence where the bull was being pastured, lifting it up enough for him to escape. But a local prosecutor seems to have decided there is no such thing as an accident when it comes to animals.
Last month, a grand jury indicted the bull's owner on criminal charges of involuntary manslaughter at the urging of local prosecutor Rose Kennedy. He faces up to 15 years in prison.
If Craig Mosher is convicted, the lives of every farmer and animal lover will be altered, dramatically and much for the worse. It is a truly horrific precedent, whether you own a bull, a cow, a dog or a cat.
I've been writing about the criminalizing of the animal world for some time now, from the efforts to ban the New York Carriage Horses and falsely accuse the drivers of abuse and deception to the arrest of Joshua Rockwood, a young farmer charged with animal abuse and threatened with jail and the loss of his farm because his water tanks froze in -27 temperatures.
The carriage trade defeated the ban, Rockwood was cleared of all charges, Mosher must also prevail. A new and radical community of farmers and animal lovers are awakened and ready and eager to support one another. This is a landmark opportunity to defend the right of animals to live with us and the rights of people who wish to live with them.
This may be the most outrageous and disturbing case yet, this shocking indictment of Mosher who lives in Killington, Vermont and is well-known and respected for the good care he has given his animals.
Even amidst the deprivations of the animal rights movement, I've never seen a case involving animals that has more ugly, outrageously unfair implications for farmers or anyone who lives with an animal – horses, cows, dogs, cats, donkeys, even chickens. From everything that is known about this case, justice is weeping in a corner.
Throughout the history of rural America, and also of urban America, accidents occur involving animals. Dogs escape from fences, pull leashes out of people's hands, run off in the woods, vanish looking for sex, cats slip out-of-doors and windows, sometimes run in street. Trees fall on the best fences, lightning strikes pastures, cars run into them, drought and rain can undermine posts, latches can rust, electric fences can short. Livestock animals are often big and strong, everyone who lives in rural America has had animals slip through fences.
Farms are not fortresses, farmers often have miles of fences to monitor, repair, inspect. And little spare time to do it.
In Maine, people are killed every year in collisions with Moose, thousands of people all over the country hit deer (I've hit and killed two, Maria hit one.) Are states to be charged with criminal offenses when these very sad incidents occur? If Craig Mosher is guilty, what about the person whose dog runs into a truck and causes it to veer into a pole or other car? Is the owner to face financial ruin, arrest and indictment?
Sometimes these animals are hit by cars and trucks, sometimes they are killed, sometimes it takes days or weeks to find them. And sometimes people are injured, even killed, in accidents. That is the nature of life, animals are not immune from tragedy any more than people are. There will always be accidents, none of us, animal or human, have any guarantees.
Even the best and strongest fences can not offer lifetime and absolute protection from escape or wandering. I have had donkeys unlatch gates, knock me down when I opened them and rush out, had sheep go right through charged five-wire fences. Just last week, our pony came up behind me and nosed me out-of-the-way to try to get through a gate I was opening (to enter) and eat the grass in the yard. If Maria was not walking up right behind me, and quickly closed the gate, Chloe could have gotten out.
When my animals get out, I call on my neighbors, we rush to help one another. It is not a crime scene, it is life. It is no big deal to see some cows trotting down a country road, we just pull up to the farmhouse, knock on the door and let them know.
In all of American history, in cities where dogs escape and in the country where cows get out – farms have huge spaces and fence lines to patrol, cows are big and nosy. All of us have stopped to help when cows and horses and goats and sheep get out – this has happened to just about every farmer in the country. It will no doubt happen to me again. Pigs are insanely clever about digging out from fences, they are very tough to catch.
It is a familiar ritual in farming communities, when we see a cow or horse or donkey or dog on the road, we pull over, stop and help.  If we can't, we call the sheriff. Usually there is no need, and they can't do much more about it than we can. Animals don't take orders or answer polite requests or obey arrogant prosecutors.
In the country, we say that escaped animals are often the way we meet our neighbors. Three years ago, our new fence failed and my sheep broke out and ran up a busy highway for a half-mile.  Trucks and cars were swerving all over the place to avoid them, it was a horrifying sight. We met Bob, our new neighbor. "This is how I meet all of the newcomers," he said, shaking my hand.
A dozen good neighbors – most of whom we had never met – came running to help that day. People pulled over in cars and trucks. Nobody called the police to have us arrested.  And I am lucky, I had $8,000 fences that far surpass legal requirements, the best fences I could buy. Few farmers have enough leftover money to do that, milk prices haven't gone up in years.
A hurricane had just passed close by, there was a deluge, and the pasture was flooded, and the fences shorted. It was an accident, and I can't imagine how it could have been avoided. We added some new fences, it has not happened since.  If the Rutland County Prosecutor succeeds in convicting George Mosher, this would now be a crime, an awful window for greedy lawyers and ambitious prosecutors to jump through.
Traditionally, accidents like these often lead to civil suits or insurance claims,  they have always been handled as civil cases. I can find no evidence that any animal accident that befalls responsible animal owners – and many people testify that Mosher is extremely responsible – has ever resulted in criminal charges, absent evidence of malice or chronic and irresponsible neglect. There is no evidence of chronic or irresponsible behavior by Mosher, nothing that would ever be called criminal or require jail time.
This message was posted on Facebook tonight by the Vermont Farm Bureau, which is rushing to Mosher's defense and asking for help:
"Please call or email senators from Rutland Vermont, Peg Flory, Kevin Mullin, and Brian callamore, and Representatives Butch Shaw and Job Tate asking them simply to try to get all charges dropped against Craig Mosher of Killington, VT.
Craig's bull was loose in route 4 at 10:30 pm last July 31,2015. He was out looking for his bull, a pet, when he learned that a motorist struck and killed his bull and then veered off the road into a tree, killing himself. It is tragic.
Mr Mosher has been charged by a grand jury in Rutland county with involuntary manslaughter. This carries a minimum sentence of one year in prison. Landowners around the area are already reluctant to rent out pastures to neighboring farmers. Other farmers don't want to let their animals out of the barn. If you live in the area drive by Mr Mosher's farm and fences. See for yourself how they are.
This was a tragic accident. This case is being pursued by prosecutor Rose Kennedy. This is not good news for anyone with livestock.
The emails for the senators and representatives are first initial last name all lower case with no punctuation @ leg.state.vt.us. For example: kmullin@leg.state.vt.us. As of now mr Mosher has a court date of june 6, 2016. Please come to court that day to show your support. We will keep updating the day and time."
The Vermont Standard quoted Texas attorney and author Jan Dawson, who has written several books about livestock accidents, as saying "I"ve never heard of anybody filing criminal charges like manslaughter." These cases are always civil cases, settled, when there are damages, in civil courts.
Yet another case perhaps, of a prosecutor who seems to know nothing about farms, or the real lives of animals. That has become a familiar story to farmers and animal lovers.
Believe me, if they can do it to him, they can do it to every one who lives with any kind of animal. If your cat runs in front of a car and causes an accident, this prosecutor believes that  you can face criminal charges.
For farmers and rural communities, this could be a catastrophe.
It means hobby farms and second homers will not permit farmers to graze on their land for fear of criminal charges. It means many farmers – this is already happening in Vermont, according to the Farm Bureau, since the arrest – will keep their cows and other animals confined in barns and never let them graze freely. It means the insurance rates of anyone who lives with any kind of animal could go through the roof.
It means farmers will incur greater expenses and live in even more fear and uncertainty. And this in Vermont, a rural state with a rich history of animals living with people.
A farmer e-mailed me this afternoon – he lives near Mosher – to say he plans to send three of his cows to slaughter because they stick their noses under the fence too often to try to get to the grass near the road. "I can't take a chance on them getting out now, that kind of indictment would ruin me. Before, when they got out, somebody would tell me and we'd get them back in. Now….I don't know. It's just crazy." He is, of course, terrified to give his name.
This is part of having a farm, there is no foolproof fence against all animals and all of nature.
Increasingly, and in part because of the furor over animal rights, we have come to see animals as deserving of perfect lives. No injuries or suffering or accidents of any kind are acceptable.
Abuse is being radically and arbitrarily redefined, and historic and traditional treatment of animals is becoming criminalized, with no public discussion or due process. As we lose touch with farms, nature, and the realities and identity of rural life, we are losing our perspective when it comes to animals. It becomes ever more expensive, controversial,difficult and dangerous to own them.
How many people will simply decide not to bother with this kind of persecution and forego the experience of having a pet bull or keeping cows alive or even getting a dog and cat? It becomes more difficult and costly and fraught every day to live with animals, and they are the ones suffering the most from this myopia, they are vanishing from the earth.
The New York Carriage Horses, perhaps the luckiest, best  regulated and best cared for horses anywhere, have to fight for their very lives every year because people would ought to know better believe it is cruel for working animals to work.
No animal and no farmer – and no ordinary citizen – would benefit in any way from such a flagrant overreach by government authority and injustice to a respected member of the community. It could happen to anyone.
The local police chief told a reporter he was stunned by the indictment, he said in 17 years he has never heard of an animal accident resulting in criminal charges. He said Mosher was a respected and admired member of the community who had never caused any kind of trouble, with or without his pet bulls and rescue donkeys.
This is not just a Vermont story, or I would not be writing about it here on my blog. This is part of a national hysteria, a new kind of witch trial, now familiar to farmers and animal lovers everywhere. It is disturbing, but also an opportunity to help a fellow animal lover and be part of the new animal awakening, a wiser and better understanding of animals than this.
I've learned in recent months that we are part of a new kind of community, we are using this new technology to support one another and fight for a rational and just way to love animals and live with them in the face of almost continuous challenge and assault. There is no way in any rational world that Craig Mosher should be facing up to 15 years in jail because his bull got through an opening in his fence that he could not  have known about or prevented.
I'll be going to the June 6 hearing,  following this case and sharing its outcome with you.

Comment: Some really interesting comments on this article on Jon Katz's Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/authorjonkatz




Monday, May 23, 2016

Killington officials advise precautions following break-ins

Rutland Herald
By Lola Duffort
STAFF WRITER | May 23,2016
 
KILLINGTON — With an unusual spate of break-ins so early in the spring, Killington officials are warning residents to be on the lookout.

“This time of year can be … a little concerning for us up here because there are quite a few vacant properties at the end of ski season,” Killington Police Chief Whit Montgomery said Wednesday.

And this year got off to a rocky start: Three home break-ins on Alpine Drive. All took place while the properties were empty.

“In the past we’ve certainly had more than we’ve had this year …” Montgomery said. “But at the same time, it’s pretty early for us to start seeing this.”

While he has been an officer in Killington, the town has had a high of 20 break-ins in a year and a low of one, Montgomery said,

The department has sent a letter to residents, reminding them to take precautions when leaving homes empty for any period of time. Montgomery said he believed the break-ins were related, and similar items were stolen from each home — winter sports equipment and television sets. The police department has no leads yet, he said.

In addition to the burglaries, three tires were also taken off a car and cash was taken out of another car in the Whiffletree condominium parking lot. Montgomery said he had leads on the car larcenies and hoped to soon interview a suspect.

Things look like they’ve been quieter in other area mountain towns.

Law enforcement officials with the Rutland County Sheriff’s Office and the Vermont State Police, who contract with Chittenden and Mendon, reported little in the way of property crimes in those towns in the past two months.

VSP Lt. Chuck Cacciatore said there had only been one property crime of note: a car stolen April 17 from a residence on Route 4 in Mendon, recovered May 6 on Trail View Lane.

“It’s pretty good. Normally, you’re right, this time of year — especially at the trail heads, we get cars broken into left and right,” Cacciatore said.

lola.duffort

@rutlandherald.com

Thursday, May 12, 2016

Killington Police Chief: Three Break-Ins On Alpine Drive

Vermont Standard
By Curt Peterson
Standard Correspondent
Killington Police Chief Whit Montgomery reported to the select board there were three break-ins in town earlier this month, so he wants to put residents on alert. All three affected houses are on Alpine Drive.
“I think I may have interrupted one of them,” Chief Montgomery said. “When I pulled into the driveway there were six pairs of skis on the ground but the thief had disappeared.”
He said two snowboards and a flat-screen TV were successfully stolen from the residence.
Montgomery advises residents who are going to leave their houses unoccupied between seasons to install deadbolt locks, automatic timers on their household lights, to have someone do frequent security checks, install alarm systems and outside lighting.
“I’m going to try to get the neighborhood watch group active again,” he said. “It’s very effective, but then when there aren’t any more break-ins people lose interest and stop being vigilant. The effectiveness increases when the crime rate is high, and decreases when it’s low.”
After the select board meeting Montgomery said the period after ski season is over is referred to as “break-in season” because so many homes in town are left unoccupied between April and November.
“The worst year for break-ins was about seven years ago,” he said. “We had about 20 incidents that summer, all around one neighborhood.”
He said the department tried everything they could think of to catch the perpetrators.
“I took my own personal pickup truck and staked out the area all night long — nothing! We couldn’t figure out what was going on.”
It turned out the burglars were members of a construction crew who were working in the neighborhood. They spent their lunch hours burglarizing empty houses in broad daylight while the police were trying to catch them at night.
“While they were working they could easily see which houses had no activity day after day, so they knew which ones to hit,” Montgomery said.
According to disastercenter.com there were 2,034 reported burglaries in Vermont in 2014. In numbers of burglaries per 100,000 residents, Vermont ranks 46 among the 50 states. The recent year with the highest number of break-ins was 2012 with 4,179 statewide.
Asked what factor he thought contributed most to an increasing or decreasing number of burglaries in town, Montgomery said, “Who is in and out of jail at the time.”
New Town Manager Deb Schwartz asked Montgomery to respond when Ely Kirschner, who introduced himself as a “fairly new resident,” inquired about the intersection of Killington Road and U. S. Route 4, which he considers very dangerous.
“I’m sure you’ve all discussed this before,” Kirschner said, “but I’m wondering if something shouldn’t be done.”
Traffic is required to stop on Killington Road before entering the highway, which Chief Montgomery agreed could be tricky, especially since Route 4 drivers can’t see the intersection until they are very close to it, and they are often driving much faster than the 40 miles per hour limit.
Select board chair Patty McGrath said strict enforcement of the speed limit would do much to improve safety at the site. Montgomery suggested later that a permanently installed speed indicator sign might be a solution.
“Those signs really slow people down,” he said. “Drivers on 4 often don’t realize how fast they’re going and the sign wakes them up.”
Other suggestions from the chief of police include installing a permanent island to show drivers turning onto Killington Road from Rte. 4 where to go, which would prevent many near-misses caused by people cutting across the Rte. 4 access lanes, particularly when snow covers the painted traffic lines.
“A flashing caution light would be another possibility,” he said.
He calculates many of the drivers have also come from other states and may be fatigued from being on the road for several hours already.
“There actually haven’t been a lot of accidents at the intersection,” Montgomery said. “But I’ve seen a lot of close calls.”
There was one crash at the site this winter in which there were minor injuries.
According to VTrans’ list of dangerous intersections this one doesn’t qualify. Statewide, Vermont State Police records say there were 6 fatal accidents in 2015 in which 9 people were killed, and in 2016 there have already been 15 fatal crashes that have cost 17 lives.
McGrath told Kirschner there wasn’t much the town could do about the intersection because Route 4 is a federal highway that is maintained by the state. Apparently Killington has requested a traffic signal in the past, but the state deemed it unwarranted. She said she would mention Kirschner’s complaint to David Rosenblum, who represents Killington at the Regional Highway Commission.

Mailbox dispute ends

Rutland Herald
By Emily Cutts
STAFF WRITER | May 12,2016
 
KILLINGTON — A Killington man will move his mailbox from a state right of way following a settlement with Vermont Agency of Transportation.

The agreement resolves a dispute between Josef Guggenberger and the agency that began in June 2014.

The issue stems from a disagreement with a neighbor over a shared driveway entrance in the state right of way off Route 4 that then leads to the two separate homes.

Guggenberger’s mailbox “sawhorse structure” and reflective poles were placed in the middle of the driveway’s entrance that hindered the neighbor’s ability to turn into it.

The agreement, reached through mediation in February and approved by the judge in Rutland civil court late last month, calls for Guggenberger to remove the sawhorse mailbox, posts and all other items he placed in the state right of way and relocate them to the “westerly side” of his driveway by June 1.

Once the mailbox has been removed, the agency is required to do work on both driveways including straightening as well as regrading both driveway accesses and perform work on the drainage ditches.

The decision also requires Guggenberger’s neighbors to file an application for a valid access permit for their driveway and record it with the town.

The case was brought to civil court on an appeal of a decision from the Vermont Transportation Board.

According to that decision and order from the Vermont Transportation Board, Guggenberger originally filed a damage claim of $523 in Rutland civil court to cover the cost of lumber for the mailbox structure and sod that he placed between two driveways, which was removed by state transportation workers.

That case was dismissed in December 2014 after a judge ruled that court did not have jurisdiction. Guggenberger then took his case to the Vermont Transportation Board and a hearing was held in March 2015.

The board ruled in favor of the Agency of Transportation on April 21, 2015. At that time, the agency filed a counterclaim alleging Guggenberger had installed another “sawhorse structure” as well as metal posts with reflectors. The agency requested an injunction to remove the items until he obtained a proper permit and penalties for each infraction

As part of the agreement, the counterclaims filed by the agency were dismissed and both Guggenberger and the agency will pay their own legal costs.

A call made after 4:30 p.m. Wednesday to the state’s attorney general office, who represented the Agency of Transportation, was not immediately returned. Calls to Guggenberger went unanswered.

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

Vigilance required to curb robberies in Killington

Mountain Times
May 11, 2016
May 11, 2016

As winter transitions into summer, Killington’s police department offers pointers regarding property break-ins and burglaries. Killington law enforcement officers will be engaging in a number of enforcement tactics to help curb these types of crimes. For example, patrol times and locations may be altered and increased, and the local police will continue working with other law enforcement agencies to gather information. It will take a community-wide effort to curb these crimes.

Here’s how you can help:

    Make your home look occupied and make it difficult to break in.
    Consider a burglar alarm.
    Include audible and video/picture surveillance. This will give law enforcement a good starting point.
    Lock all outside doors and windows before you leave or go to bed.
    Leave lights on when you go out. If you are going to be away for a length of time, connect some lamps with automatic timers to turn on in the evening and off during the day.
    Close and lock garage doors.
    Secure vacant rental or foreclosure properties from copper thefts by using a padlock and chain security device and alarm/video. Have a reputable management company or neighbor check property regularly and at different times.
    Arrange with the post office to hold your mail or arrange for a friend or neighbor to pick it up regularly.
    Arrange for your lawn to be mowed by a trusted individual while you are gone for an extended time.
    Push-button locks on doorknobs are easy for burglars to open. Replace them with deadbolt locks.
    Make sure your property is well lit. A motion-sensitive light is recommended for backyards.
    Never hide a key outside or in an exterior building.
    Trim trees and shrubs so that they cannot be used as hiding places for intruders or robbers.

Be a good neighbor. Be vigilant, pay attention to detail and report any suspicious activity to law enforcement, or call 9-1-1 immediately. Make sure you get the description of the vehicle and include the plate number and state, and note the physical descriptions of any suspicious person(s).

Know whom to contact: Always call 9-1-1 for an emergency. For non-emergencies call Killington Police, 802-422-3200 or state police dispatch, 802-773- 9101, who will call out to the closest officer to respond.

Upon request, Killington Police are happy to provide individual property checks as well. To arrange this please email or call Whit Montgomery, chief of the Killington Police Department at whit@killingtontown.com or 802-422-3200.

Saturday, May 7, 2016

Is The State Out To Get Craig Mosher?

Vermont Standard
April 21, 2016

I could not believe that the State chose to bring felony charges against Craig Mosher in the tragic accident that resulted in the death of the driver of the car that hit one of his animals.
Craig has always been a person who was always ready to help anyone and free of charge. Who would the State have brought charges against if it had been a Moose, deer, dog or even a human on the road that night?
I have horses walk past my house in the road and the cars always stop. I remember a couple of years ago a Bridgewater man hit a horse in South Woodstock and the rider was injured I think, as I remember the driver lost his driving privilege in Vermont. The sun blinded him and he did not see the horses or riders.
I guess it looks like the State is out to get you Craig or someone is, next time the State needs something, let them do it themselves.

Bridgewater
Laura Robinson 672-5013


Thursday, May 5, 2016

Board stays out of Mosher case

Rutland Herald
May 05,2016
 
KILLINGTON — Town lawyers have told the Select Board not to take any official action in support of the Killington farmer facing criminal charges after his bull escaped and caused a fatal car crash.

Killington Town Manager Deborah Schwartz said Wednesday attorneys for the town at Langrock, Sperry and Wool had advised it would be “inappropriate for the board to act, as a board, on a criminal matter.”

“Certainly the town, the Select Board members can act as individuals, in whatever capacity they chose ... but I wouldn’t be in a capacity to speak to that,” she said.

The decision by Rutland prosecutors to charge Craig Mosher with involuntary manslaughter after his bull escaped and caused a crash in last summer has been met in Killington with anger by many who consider Mosher an upstanding member of the community.

Killington resident Vito Rasenas brought the matter to the board April 19, suggesting the Select Board could help the town rally around Mosher. Another resident specifically suggested the board issue a statement on behalf of the town in support of Mosher.

“I know I certainly would personally — as a board, I would just want to check if there’s any doo-doo we would be stepping in doing such,” Select Board chairwoman Patty McGrath said at the time.
 
Comment: Such gratitude! Nevermind all the post Irene heroics, Craig Mosher, whether consciously or not, acted in accordance with the town's so called "Strategic Operating Plan", by creating a bucolic gateway to the town. He purchased a decrepit eyesore of a property and turned it into an inviting pastoral scene with grazing livestock which in turn became a much visited tourist attraction right at the edge of town. Many tourists stopped to observe and/or take pictures of the animals.
Craig's efforts with this land fulfilled several of the town plan's objectives, it beautified a critical venue in the town - literally its gateway, it attracted tourists, its made it more attractive to families- many of which were the one's stopping with their children to interact with this live diorama.
In part it is because of Craig's creation of this placid setting that he is in the legal pickle he find himself in. 
Maybe we should all cease any activities promoting the town's plans if this is the kind of gratitude we can expect.
Vito

Rose Kennedy passes hard test

Rutland Herald
May 05,2016


There are two ways a citizen can be charged with a crime in Vermont. One is where a law enforcement officer believes probable cause exists that a crime has been committed and issues a citation.
The other is by grand jury indictment. The grand jury is a panel of citizens who decide whether probable cause exists.
Grand juries are often used by prosecutors when presented with information a crime has been committed, but circumstances are such that the prosecutor wants confirmation from a jury of citizens that the charge should be brought.
This is where Rose Kennedy found herself when a person was killed after colliding with an animal in the road. While many may disagree with the indictment, it was the grand jury’s decision that probable cause did exist that a crime may have been committed.
Honoring a grand jury indictment is made that much more difficult when the person charged is an outstanding member of the community.

However, these are the tough calls a prosecutor has to deal with. Their oath of office requires them to pursue the grand jury indictment, even though it may be unpopular. Time will tell whether another jury will agree.
Either way, Rose Kennedy is doing a hard part of the job she was elected to do.
JOHN PAUL FAIGNANT
Rutland Town

Comment: If there is a test here it is of Ms. Kennedy's judgement. As one elected to use her judgement as to what incidents to bring forth before a grand jury Ms. Kennedy has miserably failed. In this case there are civil remedies available. It's not as if Craig Mosher willfully flouted the law with no regard.
As the saying goes, a prosecutor "can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich". Only one side of the case is presented, no defense is presented or allowed - the prosecutor is in full control. The grand jury is just a buffer so it doesn't look like the prosecutor is the one dictating the indictment.
As was stated in the above letter "the person charged is an outstanding member of the community" and what better way to gain notoriety than persecuting a prominent member of the community under the guise of  "passing a test" or "making a tough decision".
More and more this seems like political grandstanding in the quest for higher office. I certainly hope it that isn't the case, but making a judgement to prosecute a high profile personage, which Craig Mosher certainly is with all he has done for the central Vermont community, to gain political notoriety does not pass any tests of judgement. It just shows blind ambition.
In my opinion Ms. Kennedy shows a distinct lack of judgement in this case. There is no need to go after a criminal indictment especially when civil remedies are available (and have already been settled).
Craig Mosher has already paid a penalty, through the loss of his pet, the financial settlement reached with the Bellis family, and the emotional travail he has endured in the wake of this tragedy. 
Now he is faced with more persecution, legal bills, disruption of his business, and the looming threat of incarceration. 
Do we really need this prosecution, which is sending out tremors of panic amongst farmers, livestock owners, and even  pet owners, not just in Vermont but nationwide, who fear if something happens involving their animals they can be prosecuted? Do we really need some flatlander from Pittsburgh coming into our community with the attitude "We're going to teach him [Mosher} a lesson."
That kind of attitude is not reflective of a person with sound judgement. My grade is an F.


Vito

Don’t criminalize act of farming

Rutland Herald
May 05,2016
 
I was dismayed to find that the state’s attorney was bringing charges against my friend Craig Mosher. His bull escaped confinement, wandered on to Route 4 and was hit by a car, unfortunately killing the driver of the car. This is a very sad event but does not make Craig a criminal.

I have worked with Craig on several projects over the years and have always found him to be a very responsible individual, certainly not one to be careless with his animals.

I have had several horses over the years, and occasionally, despite my best efforts, they have gotten out. At times, I have found my neighbor’s escaped cows in my yard. Indeed, virtually all owners of horses and cows have had some get out. These are not criminal acts.

This action by the state’s attorney has the potential of criminalizing every Vermont farmer.

ARTHUR KRUEGER

Shrewsbury

Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Opinion: Vermont facing environmental crisis

Burlington Free Press


Vermont is experiencing an environmental crisis similar to the late sixties when real estate development was exploding with bad consequences for the Vermont landscape. At that time the problem was rampant large scale second home development, particularly around ski areas, without any consideration for the effect on the environment. Today it is unrestrained large scale industrial solar and wind development.
It was almost 50 years ago when the alarm was sounded and a bipartisan effort was undertaken to rein in the land developers. I was employed on the office of Attorney General Jim Jeffords and remember well the sense of crisis because mostly out of state corporations were buying large tracts of pristine land and subdividing them without any consideration even for septic disposal (“Killington where the affluent meet the effluent”).
Emergency regulations were issued and then Act 250 was crafted, modeled on Hawaii’s statewide land use law, and passed with bipartisan legislative support.
We have a similar situation today. Large scale industrial, solar and wind developments are being built with virtually no control over siting. The Public Service Board’s “build everywhere” policy is wrecking the iconic landscape that makes our state a special place underlies our tourist and second home economy.
An approach more respectful of Vermont’s fragile environment and viewscapes would be to remove siting control from our utility regulatory board and to allow local zoning and planning and Act 250 to control siting of these obtrusive developments. Act 250 is not perfect but it has played an important part over the years in protecting Vermont from some of the environmental messes in other states.
Construction might be slowed by treating wind and solar like other industrial uses, but it will occur in a deliberate and not a “gold rush” fashion. What’s the hurry? Congress has now renewed developer tax credits so that the deadline for building has been extended for five years.
Yes, Vermont should be making a contribution to reducing global carbon emissions but respectful of our unique landscape, and particularly considering that almost all our electricity is generated by low emission gas and zero emission hydro and, recently, a small amount of wind and solar when the wind blows and/or the sun shines.
Most of our emissions are from vehicle use and burning heating oil. Our electricity generation mix has for years been among the greenest in the country. Unlike the majority of states, our electricity does not come from coal or oil. Why does making a reasonable contribution to global climate control require cutting off pieces of our mountains and ridges and erecting 500-foot-high turbines and trying to cover the state with large clumps of solar collectors?
People move to Vermont and tourists come here to experience a relatively unspoiled and non-industrial landscape. People buy houses feeling protected by local zoning and planning only to find that state law allows industrial wind and solar developers to override the protections.
This is a land use crisis no less than in the sixties. Our unique Vermont landscape is at serious risk. Hopefully, our current Legislature will come to the rescue as its predecessor did in enacting Act 250 in 1970.
Ed Amidon lives in Charlotte.
Comment: Food for thought. 
Vito